Taking up ebonics, eh non-seq? You sure snookered me, what with me assuming you meant surrendering to the U.S. and all this time you meant surrendering to the Brits.
Not really. You claimed that they did not surrender to anybody, british or american. As I noted in the original post, I was recounting the events of the ship from memory. When you inquired further and denied that they surrendered to anybody I simply looked up the records of it and posted what I found.
I just can't compete with you, no how, no way.
So long as you persist in ignoring factual evidence and throwing whiny little fits such as this one when it is employed against you, no. You can't compete.
I suppose you could could say that you are correct because Grand Old Partaisan didn't specify that it had to be captured by the Union. On the other hand, Grand Old Partaisan did say confederate soldier captured and you produced a confederate sailor.
You'll have to ask him on that one. After all, a few posts back he did throw a fit about the inclusion of black sailors from the north in the grand total of black soldiers that, interestingly enough, is still less than the number he claims from the south alone.