To: Enemy Of The State
The justification is 9/11/2001. Personally I would not have "done" Iraq first. Clearly, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and N. Korea should have been "done" first.
What Iraq shows is the folly of 'boots on the ground'. There really is a potential quagmire.
So nuke 'em, Dano, and move on to the next target.
--Boris
9 posted on
07/23/2003 8:13:20 AM PDT by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: boris
Im with you on that one!
12 posted on
07/23/2003 8:15:31 AM PDT by
Enemy Of The State
(If we don't take action now, We settle for nothing later!)
To: boris
QUAGMIRE ALERT!
16 posted on
07/23/2003 8:22:03 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
("Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know." (I'm in the Sgt Schultz group))
To: boris
Uh, maybe you were so dazzled by this brilliant analysis and load of lies that you didn't notice that Afganistan was "first."
35 posted on
07/23/2003 10:58:42 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: boris
We didn't do "Iraq first". Remember Afghanistan?
46 posted on
07/23/2003 11:39:31 AM PDT by
Deb
(Do these jeans make my tag look big?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson