Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Consort
"It's strange that so many people are dissing hydrogen fuel. A small hydrogen fuel cell may eventually power homes and get us off the grid."

Hydrogen is not, and never will be, a "fuel." "Fuel" is something that contains more energy than it costs to create, and until we discover deposits of molecular hydrogen in the ground, H2 will never meet that standard. Hydrogen is a battery, a way of storing up one form of energy for more convenient use later.

The only thing a "hydrogen economy" accomplishes is decoupling energy consumption from energy production—in other words, since any form of energy can be converted economically into hydrogen, and any form of work can, once a hydrogen distribution network is established, be performed economically with hydrogen, a hydrogen economy lets us pick the most efficient methods of both production and consumption.

The dirty secret, though, is that far and away the most efficient method of hydrogen production is nuclear power. Now I, for one, am 100% behind nuclear power, so when people say "hydrogen" I say "bring it on!" Your typical hydrogen enthusiast, however, hates nukes even more than he hates fossil fuels, so I'm really at a loss to explain hydrogen's popularity.

51 posted on 07/20/2003 7:53:56 PM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Fabozz
It will be a "fuel" if enough people say it's a "fuel." The government and industry say to it as a fuel. It's probably a fuel.
53 posted on 07/20/2003 8:12:05 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson