[Poser]

Here's what we do know. At the very least he's an adulterer and the DA has enough evidence to charge him with rape. That means he's not a man of high character and is likely a rapist.

The court must presume innocence. We can evaluate the facts as we know them and form opinions. He's an adulterer who may also be a rapist.

[Howlin]

and the DA has enough evidence to charge him with rape

No, the DA has a woman who is saying she was raped and he's putting it to a jury. That's ALL we know.