Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I don't know the exact details of the buy-out, but Saf-T-Hammer could have ditched the HUD agreement by simply buying the assets of S&W piece by piece.

That's correct --- and that's one reason I wouldn't mind S&W going bankrupt. Someone would be able to buy the patents, designs, and machinery used to make the guns without being burdened by the agreement. The agreement would die, the guns would live on.

This is also the one fact that renders the "we can't lose another gun maker" point moot. Any void left by S&W's demise would be filled, one way or another.
121 posted on 07/18/2003 1:40:52 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: flashbunny
Today's Colt isn't the old Colt. Sames with Winchester and several others...
124 posted on 07/18/2003 2:43:11 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson