Rational Anarchist.
Have you read Heinlein's "Moon is a Harsh Mistress".
If not, invest a couple of days.
A particular character (Professor De La Paz) helps establish a new government on a lunar colony toward the end of the book.
An intersting model.
An executive branch, and a legislative branch.
The legislative branch is composed of a two houses.
The lower house makes laws, requiring a 2/3 majority for passage.
The upper house may only repeal laws, and requires only a 1/3 vote. Only those laws which are truly legitimate can get passed and stay that way.
Any, De La Paz is a self-described rational anarchist.
In short, he chooses to live to maximize his potential for freedom in an inherently unfree world, holding closely to a moral code for guidance, and rendering occasional aid to those whose efforts might help advance the state of liberty.
I rather like the idea.
You're a political trekkie. You wear the verbal equivalent of pointy styrofoam ears, banlon shirt, and high water sansabelt slacks, tote a plastic phaser etc. You attend all the conventions, tweaking one eyebrow up high while gravely intoning, "The law of the many is not a logical solution, captain."
And you have way-y-y to much time on your hands, wasting the time that you do during the productive hours of life, posting endless Heinlein polisci-chobabble.
I don't know who supports you (the taxpayer?), but they must have deep pockets and no clue what you are doing on their dime.