You are one articulate dude.
"... to sit back and say One Party is better then the other ..."
Is that what I said?
I thought I said one party was safer to have in power than the other.
I thought I said that America's enemies will be pulling out all the stops to put the DemocRATparty back into power.
The implications for why America's enemies (within and without) frantically want the DemocRATS back in power seems to be over your head.
And that's bad enough, but you have also shown yourself to be an intellectually dishonest reporter of my words and meaning. If you do it to me, I know you do it to others, too. GWB, eeeeeeeeeeeven.
I suspect that's because you are a member of the crowd that tells themselves, "I have seen the truth, but it makes no sense." You know --- they're the ones who refuse to know anything other than what they want to know. They're the obtuse ones who already have everything all figured out.
Better go back and read my post again, and try to control your illogical emotional reactions in order to be able to exhibit some sort of semblance of objectivity.
Oh, and by the way --- not only is the Republican party a safer party to have in power, it is also the only viable party wherein conservatism has a voice at all.
If you don't help keep Republicans in power, you are in effect, helping to take away the only voice we have.
You will not be permitted to wash your hands from your complicity in helping to take away our voice and therefore furthering the DemocRAT agenda.
Conservatives have NO VOICE AT ALL in the DemocRAT party.
You may wish to sit back and look at the above lines.. As they are one and the same, but in different wording...
"The implications for why America's enemies (within and without) frantically want the DemocRATS back in power seems to be over your head."
No, not over my head... evil is evil.. Which includes the evil from Un-Constitutional actions from any member of any party. That includes the GOP.
"Oh, and by the way --- not only is the Republican party a safer party to have in power, it is also the only viable party wherein conservatism has a voice at all."
Now that's down right funny... You may wish to read the Bills signed into Law and not the press releases put out by DC btw.. Ever hear of the Patriot Act?, Son of Patriot Act? Heck.. The Pa Hate Crimes Bill was co-written by a local GOP rep.
"You will not be permitted to wash your hands from your complicity in helping to take away our voice and therefore furthering the DemocRAT agenda."
Can you show me where... There has been a overall Tax Decrease? An decrease in Laws that are Un-Constitutional? A decrease in regs that increase the burden on business, sending them overseas? And my fav.. A decrease in un-lawful taking against Americans? Or how about Rummy standing in the way of help for our Guard, going so far as to bring up the Veto Threat :
"MOAA's Legislative Update July 11, 2003
The Secretary of Defense sent another emphatic message this week that he opposes spending any more money on health care or disabled retirees.
His July 8 "heartburn letter" to House and Senate Armed Services Committee leaders said he would "join other senior advisors to the President in recommending that he veto the FY2004 Defense Authorization Bill if it includes Senate-passed provisions authorizing concurrent receipt of military retirement pay and veterans' disability compensation benefits, or expands TRICARE." It said he'd also recommend a veto if the defense bill includes any change that would hamper a new round of base closures in 2005.
The Administration's opposition to concurrent receipt is nothing new.
It's what made Congress backpedal last year after both chambers passed substantive concurrent receipt plans. The pressure is on again this year, as the Senate-passed bill would authorize full concurrent receipt, and 201 representatives have signed a discharge petition that would force a vote on the issue in the House (see article below).
This year, Secretary Rumsfeld has stooped further to oppose much-needed health coverage continuity for drilling members of the National Guard and Reserve.
Tens of thousands of these families have experienced significant health insurance problems in recent years because of the change in their coverage
status when mobilized to and demobilized from active duty. Many had to try to find new doctors who would take TRICARE when they were mobilized, and then switch providers again when reverting to their private health plan.
Members called to war had to worry whether their families would get information about TRICARE, find a participating doctor, or encounter billing hassles.
Too often, their worries proved well-founded. The Senate responded by passing a plan to let drilling Guard and Reserve members enroll in TRICARE coverage year-round (for a fee) or elect to have the government pay part of their civilian insurance premium while mobilized. MOAA and virtually all other military and veterans' associations think such health coverage continuity is essential to protect Guard and Reserve families hurt by multiple mobilizations to fight our country's battles around the world.
If our national policy requires frequent mobilizations of the Guard and Reserve, we can't keep disrupting their families' health care. We can either build a retention tool or ignore a problem that causes many servicemembers to think twice about reenlisting. The Secretary is making the wrong choice here."
Now remem: the GOP has all there pillars of DC.
"Conservatives have NO VOICE AT ALL in the DemocRAT" party.
And you honestly feel that they do in today's GOP?