THAT URANIUM STORY

NRO ^ | 7/14/2003 | David Frum

[budwiesest]

Like this thread needs a bump, I say.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Does that include deists?

As a Christian, my answer is "yes", but I am currently speaking only about what the poster has said concerning himself.

What difference does it make to you?

[A Navy Vet]

That's a fair position, but since JR hasn't banned criticism of all things Republican, as far as I can see, then he gets his say also. Or am I wrong?

[OWK]

Who's stopping you?

How many times today have you and your cronies griped about all the "DU plants" and "people working against FR" and "people helping the democrat agenda" and "people saying bad things about your dear president"?

Maybe you don't even know you're doing it...

But I doubt it.

[tpaine]

Since you are posting my comments across threads... It would be a common courtesy to ping me to them.

Thanks for the opportunity to show off your true stripe.

[Dane]

Such as

Such as your pitiful whining and ad hominems to Jim.

To: Jim Robinson

Go git 'em Deputy Fife.

He don't always say good stuff about the republicans.

So he must be one o'them dem-o-rats er sumpthin.

15 posted on 07/15/2003 3:32 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

You read like a pity party that Jim Robinson doesn't follow OWK, 110%.

[Area51]

I'm done for the night.

[A Citizen Reporter]

There is one thing I can't stand about ONE WHO'S PROVOKED a 14 thread fest, and that's victim-hood. I've seen it ONCE TOO OFTEN.

[strela]

I wasn't going to bump it either, but the paranoid goofball contingent has shown up further downthread, and I intend to go in harm's way ;)

[Howlin]

ROFLMAO!

[OWK]

Such as your pitiful whining and ad hominems to Jim.

Ahhhh.. you accuse me of whining, and then post a poke at Jim's rib, and then witch your complaint to "attacks".

Maybe no one will notice.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I'm done for the night

[OWK]

Boy, you really told him...

[A Navy Vet]

1. I was wondering why his statements were disqualified on those grounds. Since I'm not a Christian, are my remarks automatically disqualified from a political debate? No disrespect intended.

2. Although I disagree with some of his libertarian positions, OWK is wide-read, has studied our Constitutional history and documents, and I think he adds much to a political debate. Other than that, he's kind of a know-it-all, but then he admits that right up front - doncha Dan?

[Dane]

Ahhhh.. you accuse me of whining, and then post a poke at Jim's rib, and then witch your complaint to "attacks".

Maybe no one will notice

You sure did. I surmise you don't like what you see in the mirror.

[OWK]

Not only admit it, but savor it as a profoundly enjoyable character flaw.

[Howlin]

you accuse me of whining, and then post a poke at Jim's rib

Well, now I'm totally confused.....how can you using OWK's words about Jim be constured as you taking a poke at Jim?

[budwiesest]

paranoid goofball contingent

Well, if 2004 comes down to picking between socialism dark and socialism lite, put me down for lite, however, beneath the top of the ticket I'll be voting to send 'new' blood to serve in public office, and they won't be R's or D's.

[Dane]

Other than that, he's(OWK) kind of a know-it-all,

Bill Clinton thinks of himself the same way.

[ladyinred]

Very good article. We just cannot take chances these days after what happened here, and it is just appalling that the democrats and their lapdog media are undermining our security and the morale of our troops just so they can bring down our President for doing his job. They can never redeem themselves for this, NEVER!