[FascistSlayer]

Oh, I'm never afraid to post to anyone :) After all, insults on a message board are surprisingly easy to ignore.

I am indeed aware of the regime change stance that was adopted under Clinton (again, for those who did not hear me before: I DO NOT LIKE CLINTON.) and that Hussein being out of power is a great thing. I mean, duh. He's evil. No-brainer there. :)

The problem I have? Being lied to. Simple as that.

[wimpycat]

Who lied to you? Please list the lies, and the prove that you, without any access to intelligence sources, know the truth. It will be interesting to see your sources.

Enough of this making proclamations without backing it up with facts.

Put up, or shut up!

[Prodigal Son]

I am indeed aware of the regime change stance that was adopted under Clinton

That was adopted by the Congress. Not by Clinton- by the Congress.

What have you been lied to about? Are you saying Dubya lied to you? If so, about what? Where's your proof?

[CONSERVE]

How can the statement "I can't make that claim" be lying to you?
Are you saying the President had proof that Hussein was directly involved in 9/11?
If so what proof do you have that the President knew of a direct link?

[arasina]

The problem I have? Being lied to. Simple as that.

Q One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?

THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.

So who is lying here? President Bush was being truthful in his response to the question. YOU, on the other hand, lied BY OMISSION. You, girl, purposefully neglected the second response when you chose what portion of the article to excerpt.

Nice try. You don't fool me with your "innocent" act.