[section9]

Notice how the troll moved from "being lied to about Saddam and 9-11" to being "lied to about WMD", without presenting argument one to support any of his assertions?

At each point that a Freeper called him on his lies, he changed the subject, while failing to present evidence that would prove his assertion.

The closest he came was when he provided links to stories that have since been debunked up one side and down the other.

You'll notice, for example, that having made the point that Bush lied about the Niger story, he refuses to post an argument or a fact showing that Bush lied to him. Instead, he puts the onus on British intelligence to prove to him that they are not lying. In so doing, he neatly avoids the responsibility of having to post his own proofs.

This clown thought he could pull that bullsh*t here. Not a chance, and not with me.

Another cheap debater's trick from a practitioner of intellectual Three-Card Monte.

Present facts, prat, or get the hell out of Dodge!

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[nopardons]

He's a troll, who plays fast & lose , can't debate, and has nothing but linked lies/lefty propaganda to use for " refutation ".

You are always SO magnificent, that he could not and did not even attempt to debate you. He can't. Many others, also gave him quite a what for too. LOL

Sad, but true ... lefties think we're idiots, when it's they who are.

[weegee]

I don't consider it a total loss. He has been confronted with articles (not opinion) to counter the talking points he's seen in the British press.

It may let him open his eyes that there is more to the story that they don't report.