Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FascistSlayer
Sorry, no lie. He said the Brits intel
found this to be true. They did, they
still do. Bush didn't know about the
forged doc. 'til March, SOTU was in
Jan. Irrelevant, anyway. There were
other sources besides the fake doc.

Wake up. Congress voted for force in
Oct. of '02, months before the one
line in SOTU. They lie if they claim
now that Bush's line misled them into
war.

And they called for force against SH
in '98 based on WMD intel.

They are lying about Bush & about the
past. They are traitors to America.

You are too obvious, not to be taken
at face value. The real liars aren't
even a blip on your radar screen.
228 posted on 07/13/2003 9:53:40 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette
March 2002, yes. State of the Union was 2003.

Other sources? And the proof of that allegation is where? On Bush and Blair's say-so?

Yes, Congress did vote that way. They had seen been briefed on the Niger claim before voting - think that could sway their vote at all, thinking that Hussein was trying to get nuclear weapons?
233 posted on 07/13/2003 9:59:58 PM PDT by FascistSlayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson