[r9etb]

Unfounded lies do not become you, JR. There's no racism in my post, nor is there anti-semitism.

You cannot fail to have noticed that I attributed the opinion to those who rail against "neo-cons." There does seem to be an apparent anti-semitism among those who rail against "neo-cons," and Pat Buchanan is a prime example.

So please stop with the scurrilous slander, and perhaps discuss the topic of this thread -- which, in case you didn't notice, seems to validate some of the positions taken by those nasty neo-cons in the run-up to the war.

[OWK]

No one was discussing jewish anything.

Someone used the word "neo-con", and the first thing out of your mouth was "jew-boy communist".

You stand indicted by your own words.

[OWK]

ZOT!!!

(whew, good thing I wasn't standing there... huh?)

[Jolly Rodgers]

Unfounded lies do not become you, JR.

Which is why I avoid them.

There's no racism in my post, nor is there anti-semitism.

Here we go with the denials.

You cannot fail to have noticed that I attributed the opinion to those who rail against "neo-cons." There does seem to be an apparent anti-semitism among those who rail against "neo-cons," and Pat Buchanan is a prime example.

Yes, I noticed that you resorted to an attempt to use racist language in an attempt to control the discussion. The fact that you thought you could get away with it is sad. Understandable, but sad. It may not be your fault at all, however. Perhaps you simply weren't raised right.

So please stop with the scurrilous slander, and perhaps discuss the topic of this thread -- which, in case you didn't notice, seems to validate some of the positions taken by those nasty neo-cons in the run-up to the war.

We can get back to the topic as soon as you apologize for your attempt to throw the racist epithet at me. I won't make you apologize for being a racist, because that is your right, however ignorant and ugly. But, there's no reason for you to resort to it on this thread.