[justshutupandtakeit]

That's some good stuff there, unfortunately most is either not true or exaggerated or both.

What is true, not exaggerated and both is that Bush is the only leader who should even be remotely considered as suitable for sitting in the White House. There are NO RATS even clost to suitable, third party candidates aren't even on the radar screen they are such lightweights and the GOPers who might be suitable SUPPORT W.

What does that tell you?

[tpaine]

What is true, not exaggerated and both is that Bush is the only leader who should even be remotely considered as suitable for sitting in the White House.
There are NO RATS even clost to suitable, third party candidates aren't even on the radar screen they are such lightweights and the GOPers who might be suitable SUPPORT W.
What does that tell you?
224 -jsuati-


Tells me that we have a hopelessly corrupted political system wherein we are reduced to electing anyone even remotely considered suitable.

- In other words, - principled men who honestly state their political opinions cannot be elected.
A truly bizarre development in 'democracy' as practiced by the dual party rinocrat regime in power.