i have not commented on the overall intelligence picture as it stood early this year. i merely pointed out that, if there was compelling evidence of an active nuclear program at that time, bush did not mention it in his SOTU address, while at the same time he did mention a handful of very weak and somewhat deceptive points (which you apparently don't deny). i find that questionable. if you equate that with "hatred of bush" that's your problem.
and you, unable to support your position in the argument (or even clearly recognize what it is) turn immediately to name calling and strawmen.
goodbye.