In some of these I ask Cathryn Crawford to explain the penalty she thinks appropriate for this error, and she replies with what I consider an impossible solution, due to the Civil Sevice laws. There is also an exchange with a poster that considers Rumsfeld to be a possible puppetmaster in advance of the one-world government which will be headed by the anti-Christ (a position I disagree with) and an exchange with Dan of Michigan on the exact manner and interpretation of the statement in the State of the Union speech.
At no point any of these exchanges did I indicate that I thought there was no room for dissent.
I must ask you to explain why you have pinged me with this comment. If you are assuming that because I support the President I do not tolerate dissent, I must say that is not very civil of you, considering this thread has been up for over 750 replies, and I have NOT ONCE acted in the manner in which you accuse me.
Before you hurl accusations, I suggest that you read the entire thread carefully. Thank you.
To be clear I am talking about the pack mentality of so-called Bush supporters (that kind of support why it;s hard to say it is support for it sure seems to drive away more than it brings in), Whether you see yourself in that bunch, who can say. But for sure, to me, you have fallen in with that rude pack.