[Mind-numbed Robot]

In any case, I believe the globalists have been working on all this long enough to be playing all sides against the middle.

Who are these globalists? Can we see them? Have they made any public statements or do they just work behind the scenes?

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Okay, Crawford. Now which one do you feel like? ; )

[Quix]

They've been making statements in their own inhouse, obscure documents for more than 50 years.

Their plans/outline that I read 35 or so years ago have more than 70-90% come true already. They haven't too many chunks to go before their plans are realized in a world government.

BTW, it was my job as acting head of the Univ Special Collections section of the library to store and be able to retrieve meaningfully for various researchers such documents--as well as to be able to offer some assessment as to various levels of relevance and credibility. I don't recall anyone coming back to me and complaining about how far off I was in such matters. Some asserted I was too cautious and conservative.

In hindsight--I was too cautious and conservative. I didn't put much stock in all such back then. I thought it was very fringe junky stuff indeed. Seeing so much come true in the following 35+ years has adjusted that attitude considerably.

You can track the specifics down at the better conspiracy sites and I can't even tell you which one's I'd consider better. It all weary's me so much I don't delve very deeply into it any more. I just sort of keep a tab on the tips of those massive icebergs enough to have some cursory feel for the current status and trends.

Their sequential step-by step progress has seemed inexorable.

I don't frequent conspiracy sites much. But the more balanced of them probably have the outline down reasonably accurately.

But it seems to me . . . just looking at the world's economic system; the SLAG--the chip implant SLave tAG; various levels of citizen surveillance; advances of socialism and more covert methods of tyranny to some degree; the political manoeuvers of UN type levels of things; various geopolitical issues, dynamics and changes . . . what thinking person REALLY can sanely deny the rush to a one world government?

[Quix]

I've had a hunch for a decade or 3 that the National Geographic was going to be used in a more and more overt way as a manipulation tool of the masses as it always has been vis a vis evolution.

Look at the Board of Directors of the Nat Geo. Track those people down in the various international government and corporate boards etc. that they are on. Check out the globalist leanings of those organizations.

The ingrownness of this "old boy's club" would be enough to cause some alarm in most thinking people.

You can do that without paying a single visit to a single conspiracy site.

Add in the Club of Rome, Bilderberger's group etc. . . it can get interesting.