Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kkindt
The thing is, the common-law definition of marriage is a union between one man and one worman. That has stood for thousands of years.

Let the 1% of the population who want to redefine the word invent their own. No matter how hard they want to pretend, their arrangment is not and will never be a marriage.

I can pretend I'm a steamboat all I want, run around insisting others call me "Steamboat", sue until I'm blue in the face, and accuse others of being "steamboatphobic", but it will not change reality.

Similarly the homosexuals.

"If they come down in favor of the plaintiffs, the word 'landmark' is an understatement."

I think "skidmark" is the proper word if they "go down" or "bend over" in favor of the plaintiffs.

41 posted on 07/11/2003 1:50:56 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: jimt
That's funny- the common law hasn't been around for thousands of years.
44 posted on 07/11/2003 2:00:05 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson