Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kkindt
Then you agree with Bill Clinton that he never had sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky?
34 posted on 07/11/2003 1:11:31 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: TheAngryClam
No. Sexual relations does not equate to sexual intercourse and my point is made quite well by Clinton. He tried to use the term 'sexual relations' in a narrower sense that is given to it in the dictionary. Sexual has to do with any kind of sexual contact between two persons. Relations has to do with any kind of contact between two persons. Sexual intercourse is one type of sexual relations. So Clinton tried to kill the words "sexual relations" by making them narrower rather than broader than they ought to be and have been used.
69 posted on 07/15/2003 7:34:29 AM PDT by kkindt (knightforhire.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson