"Ann is factual, therefore Ann is responsible; if anyone can show me that Ann has not been factual, then I will concede that she has not been "responsible." "
Check out this site. It's actually just one of many that pick Annie's stuff apart:
http://www.slannder.homestead.com/files/slanndermain.html There's over 30 instances cited here from "Slander" that are either proven factually incorrect(e.g. attributing quotes to the wrong people) or just a plain misrepresentation of ideas and facts. Having seen Ann enough in interviews and on TV, I'm sure if she was called on most of these types of things, she'd either just say it's a lie or act like it doesn't matter.
There's over 30 instances cited here from "Slander" that are either proven factually incorrect(e.g. attributing quotes to the wrong people) or just a plain misrepresentation of ideas and facts. Gee, thanks. Y'know, I DID check it out. The person who maintains the site can't distinguish between a "fact" and an opinion. Example:
SLANDER. Journalists are, on the whole, biased to the left. FACT. To help prove this, she says that Rush Limbaugh and his right-wing ilk don't count because they are commentators, not journalists, but does quote liberal commentators such as Maureen Dowd to demonstrate journalists' bias.
Oh, man, Ann, yer busted...
NOT!!!