Huh? Have you read this entire thread? Horowitz and Rabinowitz both attacked Coulter with faulty information, with rhetoric which could have come from Joe Conason. In fact, Dorothy and David are now being cited by liberals as "expert" in their criticism of Ann.
I don't find fault with her book. That is why I don't reproach her for it. You find something wrong?
Because she's a leggy, attractive blonde. As someone else said one on of these threads, if Ann Coulter looked like Dorothy Rabinowitz, many of the same people defending Ann would be on the attack against her.
What do you want to reproach her for? I don't think even Ann would contend she's "above reproach." It's just that she and her supporters have the McCarthyite temerity to demand some substance to the "reproaches." See, when you "reproach" someone without facts, or---God forbid---with a lie, that's called a "smear." And smears are not nice.