[Endeavor]

I haven't been vituperative. I have read the book, cover to cover. My assessment, as I've stated until the cows come home, is that it's over the top. That's an opinion. It's basis is stylistic. There is no need to "debate" it. So you can reply to this and have the last word, because I'm sick of going around and around with you.

[Map Kernow]

My assessment, as I've stated until the cows come home, is that it's over the top. That's an opinion. It's basis is stylistic. There is no need to "debate" it.

A very clever tactical retreat, Major Strasser! You could have avoided this whole damn sandbox snit by saying that in the first place. Now here's my opinion---don't jump on a thread dealing with whether or not Ann's book is factually accurate if you just want to bitch about her "smashmouth" style. It's not topical; it's irrelevant; it's dishonest; it wastes time.

So you can reply to this and have the last word, because I'm sick of going around and around with you.

And you think this pointless exchange has been a bowl of cherries for me?