Treason: Horowitz v. Coulter

Mensnewsdaily.com ^ | 7/11/03 | Bruce Walker

[DPB101]

heh...heh....can't believe what I say because I have only posted here for two months, huh?

And I defend Ann only because of her looks.

Yeah...right THOSE are not liberal type arguments at all.

As far as what you said on another thread, I may not have been posting here long but I do know the net and carrying things from one thread to the next is not good form.

Why not respond on this thread with something substantial if you have it?

[u-89]

I think neocons do not like this book because they like government and if a big half of a two party system is identified as illegitimate, a party BTW that started many programs and policies which they, the neocons support then their cherished ideals become suspect. For neocons formerly being a Democrat is not like being a reformed alcoholic who now sees the evils of drinking. These folks see all the good that government can do they just didn't like the anti-Americanism of the radicals and when the radicals took over the Dem. Party these folks became Republicans. They did not however change there view of benefits of government activism.

Also there is an established elitist aversion to McCarthy and rather than buck the system which they hobnob with they probably would rather shoot the messenger than agree with truth and seem beyond the pale to polite society.

[u-89]

Being naturally repulsed by all thing Kennedy I never read much about them specifically. Though I never ascribed genius level intelligence to any of them do you really think old Teddy is actually stupid and a pawn? do you think he has advisors and staff that guide his postitions? I just assumed he was a radical liberal of moderate/average IQ with a strong drive to destroy our country.

[CatoRenasci]

I think (and have heard from people who actually knew him fairly well 20+ yeara ago) that he is of average intelligence, but not especially astute. I think he is easily manipulated by the extreme left and that is heavily guided by the family advisors, most of whom in recent years have had hard left connections.

[nopardons]

A much needed, clear, easily understood piece of reportage ! Your addendum is also just great.

Now, if only these threads are read by ALL FREEPERs, who then spread out, all over the USA and sprfead the TRUTH, perhaps then, the fog of decades of vile propaganda will be disspelled.

[nopardons]

You aren't the only one, who has had those thoughts. I think you've nailed Horowitz, with his own wordsa; hoisted him on his ancient petard...so to speak.

[nopardons]

The SS canard has already been debunked on FR. :-)

[habs4ever]

You're not Ann Coulter, are you?

You either a shill, or an academic, or a publisher who has a TON of material at your fingertips about this one subject only.Come on, come clean.You're too slick to be an amateur.

[nopardons]

No...it's VERY productive and WILL open a lot of eyes. It's long past time, that Conservatives use Liberal tactics against the Liberals. Ann's done this and that's why the lefties and a few peculiar , supposed Conservatives are howling.

[nopardons]

WHY ? Because David is still the same person he always has been; it's just that lately, he has come clean to what many ( Me, anyway ) knew was true, in the gut, about who was wgho and what they were doing way back when. He's " seen the light "; but still has a few blindspots.

[nopardons]

Thanks for your continual postings of the facts ! Unfortunately, some here, don't care/know the facts; they just " feel ".

[nopardons]

And THAT would be as stupidly ridiculous, as the drooling, testoserone driven little boys, here, who only see what Ann looks like and ignore her mind. :-)

[nopardons]

I too am an heterosexual woman;however, I think that Ann is GREAT ! She doesn't play the old, worthless Conservative game of being a lady; no, she uses Liberal tactics against them. THis is something I have been doing for decades and it scares the bejebez outta them and works better than anything else ! Ann gets the general public to wake up and take a look at facts, which, if presented in the same old dusty way, would be ignored; just as it ALWAYS has been.

And before anyone decides to say that this kind of mudslinging is below us, read up on the politics, mudslingings, and tactics used by the FFs and their supporters and detractors...in both parties. At least dueling is now outlawed. LOL

[nopardons]

It is against the rules here, to carry arguments from one thread to another. If you can't refute something, without breaking the rules, then give up and don't post.

[nopardons]

Bobby was the rabid anti-Commie ...JFK was only a slightly more polished version of Clinton and one who had less brain power/intelligence. He was driven to get us into the Nam mess, by Jackie and the French, whom Jackie was enthralled with.

[DPB101]

The conservative clash continues. . .

[Richard Kimball]

Thanks for the ping. Bump to a good post.

[hoosiermama]

I believe it was John Adams who defended a group of "Red Coats" during the revolutionary season. In our country we believe everyone is entitled to a fair trial. Someone has to represent them. Guilty or not!

Therefore, I believe the argument against McCarthy representing an unpopular group is a moot issue. JMO

[u-89]

He was driven to get us into the Nam mess, by Jackie and the French, whom Jackie was enthralled with.

Never heard it put that way before nor ever thought of Nam in that light but what you say actually makes some sense to me. Thanks for posting that.

P.S. I love Paris but was rather bummed when I saw Kennedy Blvd. signs for the first time. Guess the French were enthralled with him - or her too.

[hoosiermama]

You should send a copy of post #1 to Horowitz. Excellant work!