Okay, but Bandow says,
The point is not that the administration is necessarily guilty of misbehavior, but that it should be forced to defend its decisionmaking process.
What's the problem with that statement?
What's the problem with that statement?
Whether intentionally, or not, Bandow is giving credence to liberal claims that the Bush admin is "guilty of misbehavior". Why even say something as outlandish as this?
And please explain to me, RJ, why Bush has to explain the process used to reach a decision? This is incredible, and the height of arrogance, for a reporter, especially one of our guys, to insist on. Bandow and the rest of the media need to just worry about the result(s), not how they were arrived at.