[jla]

Yes, but, if thru the process of validation it is revealed that these people are being dishonest, doesn't that show you that you can't believe in certain people without validation?

Absolutely. That's why the No Need For Validation list isn't a very long one.
But surely included are people like RR, Dubya, Peggy Noonan, Jean Kirkpatrick and a few others.

[Blzbba]

"But surely included are people like RR, Dubya, Peggy Noonan, Jean Kirkpatrick and a few others. "


Absolutely. I forgot to add "the media should be validated too". One only has to look at that NY Times scandal to see the problems that causes!

[Blzbba]

Whoops - I misread your reply...

I think any President needs to be taken to task re:Information validation. If there's nothing to hide, then there's nothing to worry about. And, if thru the process of said validation, the discrediting parties are proven incorrect(Dems for RR, GOP for Clinton (GOP was rarely wrong about that snake!)), then so much the better! Wouldn't it be nice to say to Dem-Bush haters "Shut the hell up - everything you question is already proven to be fact!", rather than "You should just believe the President!"?

thanks for the responses! have a good weekend.