Skip to comments.
Frozen Stars - Black holes may not be bottomless pits after all
Scientific American ^
| July 7, 2003
| George Musser
Posted on 07/10/2003 6:09:58 AM PDT by Damocles
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Interesting concept.
1
posted on
07/10/2003 6:09:59 AM PDT
by
Damocles
To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
07/10/2003 6:11:09 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Damocles
A true black hole is the most interesting object in astronomy. Think of it as an immensely, unimaginably powerful aggregation of nothingness.
3
posted on
07/10/2003 6:13:21 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Think of it as an immensely, unimaginably powerful aggregation of nothingness.I've used that definition to describe the Democratic party for years...
4
posted on
07/10/2003 6:19:34 AM PDT
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: goldstategop
"Think of it as an immensely, unimaginably powerful aggregation of nothingness." Sounds like Al Gore's mind.
5
posted on
07/10/2003 6:21:57 AM PDT
by
sd-joe
To: Damocles
Mmmmm - fried ice cream...
6
posted on
07/10/2003 6:25:49 AM PDT
by
trebb
To: Damocles
"Frozen Stars - Black holes may not be bottomless pits after all" There is only one bottomless pit:
To: shadowman99
Oh sweet Moses...my eyes...my EYES!!
8
posted on
07/10/2003 6:30:59 AM PDT
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: Damocles
These guys should write a paper, do the math and THEN talk to a reporter after publishing.
9
posted on
07/10/2003 6:34:55 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: Damocles
Goes back to the old Hoover Vaccummatic theory of the Universe. Boils down to "Black Holes Suck"
10
posted on
07/10/2003 6:37:03 AM PDT
by
Conan the Librarian
(I am a Librarian. I don't know anything....I just know where to look it up.)
To: Centurion2000
Ahh, where's the fun in that. Wild speculation is always more enjoyable...
11
posted on
07/10/2003 6:37:27 AM PDT
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: Damocles
"Sh*t!" -- "Stargate" writer
To: Damocles
Bump.
13
posted on
07/10/2003 6:42:51 AM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(>>>>>My mind is a Black Hole before my morning coffee<<<<<)
To: Damocles
"I don't see how something like a massive star... can make a transition into something with as bizarre a structure as a gravastar." As I recall, black holes were also considered bizarre and beyond liklihood when they were first proposed.
I wonder, though, if a molecular cloud has the same basic properties as a gravastar, yet in growing over time it has become more stable?
14
posted on
07/10/2003 6:43:54 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: Damocles
I'm glad no one mentioned Oprah on this thread
15
posted on
07/10/2003 7:19:06 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: aruanan
PM alert!
"Maybe spacetime is literally a kind of fluid"
Like the ether theories proposed?
To: Gary Boldwater
"Maybe spacetime is literally a kind of fluid"
Fluidic Space Alert! Species 8472 incoming!
</star trek voyager mode>
17
posted on
07/10/2003 8:05:13 AM PDT
by
MalcolmS
(Do Not Remove This Tagline Under Penalty Of Law!)
To: Gary Boldwater
Yup, back to the ol' 'aether' after 100 years! I'm taking this opportunity to publicly declare:
"It really _IS_ turtles all the way down!"
Another twenty years, and I'm gonna look like a GENIUS!
18
posted on
07/10/2003 8:07:05 AM PDT
by
Dick Steele
("All my life, I've had just ONE dream: To achieve my many goals." Simpson)
To: shadowman99
How'd you get a picture of my ol' lady?
19
posted on
07/10/2003 8:18:25 AM PDT
by
sandydipper
(Never quit - never surrender!)
To: theDentist
As I recall, black holes were also considered bizarre and beyond liklihood when they were first proposed.
Black holes were first proposed long, long before Einstein and Hawkings were even born.
20
posted on
07/10/2003 10:35:10 AM PDT
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson