Replies

At one time, a couple wanted and needed several children to help on the farm or business. Even in the early 20th century, children normally went to work at a young age, so they weren't the financial drain they are today. This is still true in third world countries.

Another reason for the very low birthrate is that the welfare state renders the family unnecessary. Why have kids -- You can spend all of your money on yourself and the government will take care of you in your old age, disability, etc. On the other hand, in most of the countries of the world today, the family is still the primary, if not the only, source of welfare assistance. In these countries, if you are old or sick, and have no family to take care of you, you are in trouble.

In some countries, people still want -- and need kids. And they are reproducing.

Another reason for the very low birthrate is that the welfare state renders the family unnecessary.

Which is why it must be abolished.

"Why have kids -- You can spend all of your money on yourself and the government will take care of you in your old age, disability, etc."

You can't afford to have kids; the government takes half of your money to throw it away on those who won't work, and there will never be enough government money to support us in old age. Who are you kidding?