He did cover it in the article. Whoever this guy is he always wanted to be anonymous, until this time. He also says that he got a second source for early stories and was satisfied that the guy was genuine based on those confirmations. It's a classic intelligence op. A long term one. A well financed one.
Someone has been actively twisting "anonymous" source information for at least 20 years to news media in Washington. They've done it in a slow, patient and very expensive way. Who might do that? Ask who benefits, particularly from this latest attack on Bush. It ain't Republicans (John McCain excepted).
Anyone got a queen of hearts handy?
I'm sorry, If I lie to you once and you fall for it, shame on me, If I lie to you twice and you fell for it again, Shame on you.
I need more than an un-named source to make me believe that Wilkinson wasn't just made up