Sorry, Jim. Although Doug helped you out through the Lawsuit, I simply can't stomach this "mystery guest" story without any secondary sourcing. For instance, to assert that I proceed from a strictly partisan point of view while Doug is strictly nonpartisan ignores his screed against Bush back in February called "Madman of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue".
It was the kind of thing you'd read on DU, and it was repulsive. It was also bad fiction.
If you want to call yourself "mad", then call yourself an "opinion writer" and publish CHB as an opinion journal. Just don't pretend to be a reporter.
Be Seeing You,
Chris