Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: m&maz
Here is the real plan, foreshadowed:

Asked if there might come a day when it would no longer be the last word on the law, she said: "Well, you always have the power of entering into treaties with other nations which also become part of the law of the land, but I can't see the day when we won't have a constitution in our nation."

According to many (liberal) interpretations treaties, once ratified, become co-equal with the Constitution. It is considerably easier to enter into a treaty that to ammend the Constitution. Thus the liberal plan to destroy the remaining inconvennient parts of the Bill of Rights is to negotiate it away to the UN, World Court or any other body that wants. Once we've signed the "Internataional Accord on the Limitation of Small Arms" the living-breathing types will use the treaty clause to say "this replaces the Second Ammendment".

You can see they are thinking ahead, and setting the stage with the sodomy ruling.

13 posted on 07/07/2003 7:09:53 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
You make an excellent point.
14 posted on 07/07/2003 7:20:07 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
If these twits want to look to Europe to see how we should regard the 2nd Amd, they may discover the Rule of Five is trumped by Rule 308.
17 posted on 07/07/2003 7:58:47 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson