[MHGinTN]

The game is known as 'democrat agitprop' ... go to news discussion websites and try to raise as much doubt and division as possible using any lies or dissembling imaginable, with fellow agitprops chiming in occasionally to lend an air of responsible discussion, then skip on to the the next. These democrat operatives come and go. We see them more often, now that the president's approach to protecting America appears to be working. Note, if you will, the snide little ridicule of 'pre-emption'. Clues, lots of clues, accented with specious denials and a glaring lack of facts and a desire to 'jump the gun' and reach premature conclusions. The same operatives will be nowhere to be heard when WMD evidence sufaces all the more. They do their hench work and move on to their next assignment.

[BJungNan]

Thanks for the explanation. I have not seen that many one FR but they sure stick out when the come here. Usually people here try to support their arguments. Not everyone always does or is right. But they stand corrected in the face of logic and reason.

I should have figured something was up with these two. Do they really expect people to fall for such nonsense? Also, I have not looked closely at all the posts, but I don't think he answered one direct question put to him.