Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkeman1
A third party vote is totally wasted until one of the two major parties is totally discredited by a major cataclysm.

If it should come to pass, by the time of the election, that it is obvious to everyone (except a few remaining Bushbots) that he lied intentionally-would that not count as a total discrediting of the man? And also of the party, if they keep on making excuses for him. I think that the Republicans would be best served in leading the investigation, and making sure it was honest. If it comes out that it was an intentional lie, so be it. They should dump him to save themselves.

Of course, they could do what Tony Blair is doing-blaming underlings for feeding him false information. Who knows, maybe the public will believe that.

137 posted on 07/07/2003 5:07:58 PM PDT by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Mike4Freedom
If it should come to pass, by the time of the election, that it is obvious to everyone (except a few remaining Bushbots) that he lied intentionally-would that not count as a total discrediting of the man?

Yes it would. But political reality is that such hearings will never come to pass before the election as Republicans control both houses- at least not open hearings. If the war is still dragging on with a 3-5 killings a week of our troops and the economy is still anemic or worse then Bush is gone. And then you will have hearings that might lay waste to the Republican party. Yes- it is a good idea for Republicans to lead such an investigation now. Will they? No.

138 posted on 07/07/2003 5:25:59 PM PDT by Burkeman1 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson