Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioman
Being no Rhodes scholar myself, I have nothing against plain talk--and you're right, it's a little unfair to expect Bush to be Winston Churchill. But my point is--and tripod and others have said this well enough--is that "Bring It On" doesn't become a leader who is not on the battlefield. Only soldiers who are in the line of fire have the right to taunt their enemies in that kind of fashion (again, I speak as a non-combatant, so flame at will if this is a poor assumption). What happens if a Mogadishu-type disaster happens on our troops? It is the soldiers who suffer the casualties. Bush and the other bureaucrats will just suffer political fallout and foot-in-mouth disease.
54 posted on 07/02/2003 1:53:12 PM PDT by MaxPlus305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: MaxPlus305
Bush and the other bureaucrats will just suffer political fallout and foot-in-mouth disease. Since you are newbie, I won't bother responding except to say: Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle.
59 posted on 07/02/2003 2:13:07 PM PDT by BullDog108 (Feles mala! Cur cista non uteris? Stramentum novum in ea posui.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: MaxPlus305
Don't worry, the soldiers love leaders who talk plainly and tough in battle. I know this is true.

The Prez is really stating his confidence in our boys wiping the bastards out. Nobody said the President had to be a feminized wuss.
92 posted on 07/03/2003 5:50:02 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson