Skip to comments.
CALIF. BEGINS FISCAL YEAR WITH NO BUDGET
The Associated Press ^
| Tuesday, July 1, 2003
| By TOM CHORNEAU
Posted on 07/01/2003 6:13:54 PM PDT by Swanks
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - For the third consecutive year, California began the new fiscal year Tuesday without a state budget after lawmakers were unable to break a partisan impasse over spending and taxes.
Five other states also took their budget deliberations to the June 30 deadline without reaching a final agreement.
Lawmakers in Oregon, New Hampshire and Connecticut approved short-term spending plans allowing government to operate while debate continued.
Residents in Nevada and New Jersey also began Tuesday without a new budget. In Massachusetts, Gov. Mitt Romney signed a $22.1 billion state budget on the final day of the fiscal year, the first time in seven years a budget has been completed on time. He then immediately issued $201 million in vetoes, including a $23 million cut in additional assistance to cities and towns. North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley also signed a budget on the last day of the fiscal year Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
07/01/2003 6:13:55 PM PDT
by
Swanks
To: Swanks
Isn't ol' Joe Graham back in NY?
2
posted on
07/01/2003 6:36:55 PM PDT
by
WSGilcrest
(R.........6th generation Californio)
To: Swanks
Don't have a budget... Can't be 38 Billion over Budget....
3
posted on
07/01/2003 6:43:18 PM PDT
by
RS
(nc)
To: Swanks
In the land of fruits and nuts.....they don't need no stinkin' budget!
4
posted on
07/01/2003 6:48:05 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Diversity and bipartisanship....the watchwords of pathetic losers.)
To: Swanks
California went from 9 Billion surplus to a 38 Billion deficit years? What was the income received and how was the money spent?
5
posted on
07/01/2003 8:43:03 PM PDT
by
BIGZ
To: Swanks
Didn't California receive a 1.5 billion settlement from El Paso Corporation on gas issues? I realize that would be an insignificant amount of compensation for no wrong doing and that it would not contribute to their bottom line (it will be lining pockets instead), so my heart really feels compassion for them in their time of need. Whannnh!
6
posted on
07/02/2003 12:51:26 AM PDT
by
slasher82
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson