Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pan_Yans Wife
As another poster here suggested, the TSA is for "soccer moms." It's a pretend security blanket with absolutely no real security. But it makes the soccer moms feel secure. So, in that sense, yes, it is effective.

A major point of contention here is that while they are busy frisking grandma in her wheelchair, or harassing some golfer about a butane lighter, the real terrorists slip thru.

Bottomline, random searches are ineffective since that leaves a window of opportunity for those so inclined.

In order to be truly effective, all passengers should be searched and screened.

Meantime airline security provided by the TSA is a myth sanctioned only by the soccer moms and not shared by those who know better.
211 posted on 07/02/2003 9:07:11 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: takenoprisoner
But, I am working under the assumption that TSA is the newest federal program that is here to stay. I do not know how to get around it. Even Sen. Harkin recently blew through the checkpoints at the airport, because of his busy schedule. Yes, it isn't fair, and no, they shouldn't search Grandma. However, even as inept as the system is, isn't it conceivable that they have thwarted some future attacks? I think it might be... at least halting the "copy-cat" type cases... the shoe bomber, etc, not to mention removing the felons from airport security.
212 posted on 07/02/2003 9:11:58 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson