[aristeides]

David Frum's column, JUN. 27, 2003: SODOMY IN TEXAS , explains why the effect of Lawrence's overruling of Bowers is to render homosexuals a constitutionally protected group, under Romer v. Evans. Scary.

[MHGinTN]

As Frum says, we're lucky to have a man named Thomas on the high court. What Justice Thomas said regaridng the Lwrence case was so very precisely right, (paraphrasing) 'the Texas law was silly'. Had Texas banned all sodomy regardless of sexual proclivities, er, excuse me--that no longer works to define homo degeneracy, I mean regardless of sex of the participating parties, sodomy would continue to be bannable and the idiocy of defining a group of people for special legal status based on their professed sexual proclivities chosen voluntarily would not have become an issue to be rule in fiat fashion by an activist, societal engineering court. But you know what?... The degenerate homosexual agenda was seeking every state to find just such a set up as the Lawrence case over which to drag this nation into the gutter via a SCOTUS fiat ruling. And the degenerates of homosexual definition succeeded.