Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
The state already went there "honey."

And if a law violating the 2nd or 1st Amendment or 4th were struck down by the Supreme Court, would you then say that the Feds were inserting themselves into that area of life? HUH?

It makes no logical sense, "honey."
269 posted on 06/29/2003 9:22:58 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: All
for those so concerned about the violation of the 10th Amendment and state's rights, where is your concern for the 9th?

And tell me this: If the SCOTUS doesn't stand up for the 9th Amendment and all of our unenumerated rights, who will? Shall we have a revolution or rebellion each time an anti-2nd, 9th, 4th or 1st Amendment law is passed? If the state's take upon themselves the right to make private activity unlawful it is THEY who violate the Constitution, not the decision to strike down their evil laws.

Would the State Supreme Court strike down a law based on the 9th Amendment? Perhaps, but damn, you gotta find justice SOMEWHERE, right?

ANd please stop quoting Scalia, he doesn't know when to quit when it comes to law and order, to the point where he forgets our actual Bill of Rights.
271 posted on 06/29/2003 9:26:21 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson