To: Sci Fi Guy
Neither of them was "unconstituntional." It is the job of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution. By definition, their interpretation is correct, as the Constitution grants them that authority.
Where does the Constitution grant the Supreme Court the authority to be the interpreter for the Constitution?
334 posted on
06/29/2003 3:47:39 PM PDT by
gitmo
(The perfect symbol for democracy: the guillotine.)
To: gitmo
Where does the Constitution grant the Supreme Court the authority to be the interpreter for the Constitution? That was his argument. It was jlogajan whom you need to ask that question to.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson