[kcar]

I'm certainly happy with that decision. The government has no business restricting private consensual activity. That was a big win for freedom.

Now, on the U 0f Michigan decision - whatever were they thinking? Freedom, not diversity, is what we're about. Diversity happens, or doesn't, based upon how people behave, now how government thinks they should behave.

[shred]

I agree with you on both counts. They were correct in the Texas case, but they were attempting to have government engineer an outcome (utilizing an utterly unconstitutional methodology, imho) in the Michigan case.

Having said that, these guys were mostly appointed by Republican presidents, and I'd be hard pressed to figure out how we are going to get more conservative, liberty minded justices. We certainly don't want a Democrat Prez appointing them!