Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Feral51
It simply means that there is more reliance on natural processes to effect things like shutdown and heat removal and less on engineered safeguards. Such passive safety features generally result in higher reliability for safe operation. You don't have to worry about an engineered system failing because processes that rely on the laws of physics will not fail.

The PBMR is one of several Generation IV reactor designs that are being looked at. I am involved in a couple of others, the Westinghouse IRIS design, which is a light water reactor, and the General Atomics MHTGR, which is a bit more exotic. There are some really exotic ones proposed, like the vapor core high temperature reactor, which features first-stage power extraction based on a magnetohydrodynamic generator. Talk about efficiency, that one has it in spades...

5 posted on 06/27/2003 5:49:34 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
The U.S. hasn't built a new commercial nuclear power plant in over 20 years.
And there have been a LOT of technology improvements since the majority of them were built in the '60s and '70s.
The moratorium on new construction has lasted way too long.
It is time for our nation to take advantage of these significant upgrades.
6 posted on 06/27/2003 10:26:06 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson