Replies

jayef wrote, (we'll dissect it as we go)I'm sorry. Explain to me why you are interested in where people stick their penis. Beyond that, what is the compelling interest of the state? jayef I'm only morally responsible for where I stick my body part, sweetums. You are responsible for yours. When sexual behavior effects society (as in healthcare costs, disease, corruption of children), I get very interested in that! Don't you, dear?... Or do you want to play and someone else pay?

How do you get around the discrimination against a class of people without using the sophistry of Scalia. Baby, deviants choose to be deviants, and they want to be identified for their sexual deviant proclivities. The deviants have set the stage, not Scalia. There is no excuse for prejudice. When a chosen class of behavior is a corrupter of society and a BIG drag on the healthcare system, it is in fact a good thing to be prejudiced against that sickness! Sorry you pansy-assed liberal deviancy apologists don't understand that. Grow up. Hiding behind religion to justify your prejudice is even more disgusting. You brought up religious, little nettle.

I'm not peddling anything. I can't find anything in the Supreme Court's decision or in my statements to you which would compel you, or even suggest to you, that you go out and have any kind of sex . . . gay, straight or otherwise. What a stupid strawman to try and raise! You have been hanging out with the wrong mental midgets, sweetums.

You talk about nations tolerating deviancy corroding and destroying society . . . tell me, what happens to nations that tolerate bigotry and discrimination? Again, a certain degree of intolerance is healthy for the society. When you and your deviant butties succeed in removing intolerance toward your deviancies (if you succeed), you will have destroyed this Republic for what you prefer, in the name of tolerance for your deviancy preferences. I have a clue for you, the answer is not in The Bible. The answer, my friend, is in the Constitution of the United States. You haven't a clue, son, not a clue.

You are absolutely hopeless. None of what you have said deals with the question at hand. Healthcare costs? Talk about a strawman. What does that have to do with Texas' struck down law? Deviants want to be identified? I suppose you would prefer that the state break into their homes and tag them . . . as was done under Texas' struck down law?

Intolerance is NOT healthy for society. Bigotry is NEVER acceptable in society. MY DEAR, you are the one who is sick. Your hatred has so twisted your mind that you would tolerate any transgression of the state . . . as long as it targets behavior and people you don't like. Well guess what, pumpkin, one day someone may define something that you do, may put some part of your existence on a hit list.

Won't it just be so fortunate that we will have already had plenty of practice wiping out the fags? Won't it be grand when the "morality police" come charging through your door?

Most of you who are having conniptions over this decision, which finally brings us our of the dark Ages, will find your personal lives NOT ONE BIT different than they already were. For one thing, only a handful of states even had such laws on the books anymore, so only 13 states are even affected. Second, why are you so obsessed with where others are sticking their peepees, anyway? I have to wonder about you, and the phrase "get a life" comes to mind...

This is about CONSENTING adults. Maybe YOU want to live in a country where the Govt tells consenting adults what they're allowed to do in the privacy of their own bedroom, but I don't. Perhpas you should move to Iran or Iraq, where many sexual acts are highly restricted and severely punished.

And for those bemoaning the fate of ""The Children"...huh? We are not talking about ped0philia, we are talking about sodomy between consenting adults. Sometimes these consenting adults were man and wife, BTW--many states still outlaw what husband and wife do in their own beds. Even regarding homosexual sodomy, CONSENTING ADULTS are the focus here; ped0philia has always been, and will continue to be, illegal and severely punished. (BTW, over 95% of pedophiles are men who prey on GIRLS. Why don't you outlaw those freakish "Child Beauty Pageants" where the tots dress up in makeup and strut around like Hooters waitresses, if you're concerned about "Children"??).

Bottom line, in what purports to be a FREE country, it is absurd that any laws telling consenting adults what they can do behind closed doors have been on the books EVER. Thank God 6 justices realized this, instead of keeping us in a "Big Brother" type government.