Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ellery
"No, that was one of the main issues: in Texas sodomy was legal between a man and a woman, but illegal between two people of the same sex. However, the court seemingly did not overturn the law on this equal protection basis."

But if this is based on the ever elusive unwritten constitutional right to privacy how do you maintain that a child and an adult do not have that same right to violate the law as long as their doing it behind closed doors?

107 posted on 06/26/2003 8:51:07 AM PDT by Taxbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Taxbilly
The way I read it, it's based on private, consensual activities -- the assenting judges make this point again and again. Otherwise, it would also legalize serial killing and anything else one does in private. That's not to say I agree with the legal argument for this ruling -- I don't. I'm just relating why I don't think this creates precedence for pedophilia.
130 posted on 06/26/2003 9:05:15 AM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson