Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thane_Banquo
Indeed. Mark my words: This decision will be used by NAMBLA and other child molestors and child pornographers to challenge bans on sexual abuse of children.

Oh jeez, even on the right, people have to drag "the children" into every argument for emotional shock value.

This ruling is about consenting behavior between adults in private.

Child abuse and sexual age of consent laws are not affected in the least by this ruling

90 posted on 06/26/2003 7:32:40 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: dead
Child abuse and sexual age of consent laws are not affected in the least by this ruling <pP 100% correct.
97 posted on 06/26/2003 7:34:00 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: dead
I love how people go nutty. Yeah... the supreme court is going to rule raping 4 year olds and doing cocker spaniels is ok too now. Whatever.

One can disagree with this ruling without engaging in full blown hysterics.

98 posted on 06/26/2003 7:34:15 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson