Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
You can't. While legally, she may be at the age of concent, she has not yet reached the age of majority

Is she or is she not a consenting adult at age 16 (140 in some states.

I can see why your uncomfortable but this example is precisely why some of us have a problem that the "nuclear" option was chosen to get rid of sodomy laws.

871 posted on 06/26/2003 11:45:06 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 842 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
I think the parent/child relationship trumps the consenting age deal.

It would still be considered Child Abuse, No?
886 posted on 06/26/2003 11:48:34 AM PDT by ffusco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Is she or is she not a consenting adult at age 16 (140 in some states.

Reading comprehension is a virtue you should cultivate. While she can consent to having sex at 16, YOU ARE STILL HER LEGAL GUARDIAN UNTIL SHE REACHES 18. I'm not coming at this from a moral standpoint. Just a legal one. Morally, I'd kick your ass on principle. Even though, by my own standards, this would obligate me to also pay your doctors bills and any missed work time.

I can see why your uncomfortable but this example is precisely why some of us have a problem that the "nuclear" option was chosen to get rid of sodomy laws.

Your straw man has NOTHING to do with sodomy laws. Logic doesn't bend that far.

889 posted on 06/26/2003 11:51:00 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson