[freeeee]

to get the result you wanted (remove sodomy from the books) you have gutted the ability of states to pass any laws that restrict sexual habits.

Laws concerning non-consensual behavior will be unaffected.

Privacy will trump everything else.

What's wrong with privacy?

it could have been done at the state level by the court returning it the Texas

I agree. My only concern is that this violates the 10th Amendment.

The correct ruling would have been that Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress no power to create a federal law concerning sodomy, and that private consensual activity is a protected right under the 9th Amendment at the federal level.

And that the 10th Amendment reserves the power to regulate sodomy to the many states, as their respective constitutions allow.

[VRWC_minion]

Laws concerning non-consensual behavior will be unaffected

Non-consenual is in the eye of the beholder. Who can consent ? At what age ? Who can judge acts done in privacy ?