No, for several obvious reasons.
1. The pill is not a failsafe birth control measure.
2. The emotional damage inflicted on a child makes the child of the parent incapable of consent with the parent, even if they are otherwise competent to consent to sex with other adults.
3. The family is a traditional American institution where the boundaries of authority (i.e. father/daughter, mother/son) must be respected in order to stregthen and preserve the family unit. Sex with relatives destroys that.
There is a better case for de-criminalizing "incest" with first cousins, but I'm not prepared to go there yet.
Trace
We have abortion or the morning after pill as a back up. Plus, we can refrain from intercoure
2. The emotional damage inflicted on a child makes the child of the parent incapable of consent, even if they are otherwise competent.
She is either capable of deciding or she is not. If the state says she is capable and she does it in her private home who is the state to intrude ?
3. The family is a traditional American institution where the boundaries of authority (i.e. father/daughter, mother/son) must be respected in order to stregthen and preserve the family unit. Sex with relatives destroys that.
The family is an outdated religious constraint. Don't go imposing your religious views on me and my daughter