I didn’t call anyone a child molester…I’m only saying you support the slippery slope, that doesn’t mean you want to engage in those acts.
Oh, I’m sorry. You weren’t saying that people who agree with this ruling are actually child molestors. You were only saying that they support child molestation without actually engaging in it.
Well I won’t say you’re a moron. I will only say that you produce moronic statements and then back them up with additional moronic statements.
And my comments were on point because I was addressing the slippery slope, and what the real meaning of this ruling is.
The real meaning of this ruling is that this particular law against homosexual sodomy by consenting adults in Texas is considered unconstitutional by the current Supreme Court.
It has nothing to do with age of consent. It has nothing to do with child molestation. You have adhered these things to the ruling, but that doesn’t make it so.
Dance around it however you want, Lib, the truth is right in the majority opinion.
Yes the truth is there. I guess you can’t read very well. From Kennedy’s opinion:
The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter.
Everything is.