To: Thane_Banquo
from Kennedy's opinion:
The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter.
To: jethropalerobber
318 posted on
06/26/2003 8:39:17 AM PDT by
Carlucci
(The Time Travelers meeting will be held Yesterday!)
To: jethropalerobber
Sounds like Kennedy, in giving his opinion, had heard all the specious histrionics that gets hashed and rehashed on FR every time a thread on this subject comes up. He also decisively shot down that folly.
383 posted on
06/26/2003 8:57:32 AM PDT by
tdadams
To: jethropalerobber
The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter. Yes, but just like Roe, it will be expanded to allow those behaviors.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson