Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
bisexuality is homosexuality

You're so wrong, but I will concede the point since it's irrelevant to this case.

I contend sodomy laws pre 1960 were for homosexuals because no right minded person thought any different and yet here we are.

Are you saying that heterosexuals have not been punished for becoming involved in oral or anal sex?

1,332 posted on 06/26/2003 3:45:58 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1323 | View Replies ]


To: george wythe
You're so wrong, but I will concede the point since it's irrelevant to this case.

There’s no part time pathologies, either you have the disorder of same sex attraction or you don’t…either you have child sexual attraction you don’t, there’s no such thing as a hetero-pedo-sexual.

Are you saying that heterosexuals have not been punished for becoming involved in oral or anal sex?

Outside of public sex, I think not but those legislatures that make that distinction in their law clearly did so to avoid what happened today. And I would presume put the “equivalence” laws on the books post 1960 and probably since 1980.

1,340 posted on 06/26/2003 3:55:37 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson