To: HumanaeVitae
This behavior damages society in that way because it breaks a taboo of society, namely that sex is for procreation inside of monogamous marriage. i imagine that within 20 years gays will have both state recognized monogamous marriages and the ability to reproduce directly with each other.
i assume you would have no problem with them at that point in time, correct?
To: jethropalerobber
They gay/bi debate was over by the 80s. You can now be gay bi transgendered poly mo fo.
BTW since beastiality is a sexual orientatio, how long do you it will be before we have a case about it.
1,251 posted on
06/26/2003 2:38:57 PM PDT by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: jethropalerobber
i assume you would have no problem with them at that point in time, correct? No, I still would. Homosexuality is immoral now and forever. Having said that, I'm consistently amused by you libertarians always instantly promoting social conservatives to positions of super-authority. Gotta be Freudian. Anyway, if society has descended to that point and people have no problem with it, there's not much one guy banging away on a keybord on the North Shore can do about it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson