[jwalsh07]

I don't cheer the decision. But it's not unexpected.

That's not good enough. They could have written a decision based on "equal protection" because the law did not apply to heterosexuals as well. I would have understood that.

They didn't, they used Roe, bad case law, as a precednt for a privacy right nowhere to be found in the COnstitution. The Constitution is amendable, taht's how you change it.

I can't stand judicial activism, it reeks of elitisma nd hubris and pisses me off.

[Cathryn Crawford]

I don't like it simply because I think they interfered where they had no right to. As a Texan, I can say - we're capable of handling it ourselves. Leave it to the states.